On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 12:53 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > From: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 12:36 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 05:46:48PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > (Did this fall through the cracks? I don't see it in -mm. It's > > > standalone, and saves some silly code in lguest and presumably others). > > > > Normally it should go to some some console maintainer? > > Hmm, but who? > > > Ok I can add it. > > Thanks. While you're in a patch-applying mood, how about this? > > Cheers, > Rusty. > == > Use X86_EFLAGS_IF in irqflags.h. > > Move X86_EFLAGS_IF et al out to a new header: processor-flags.h, so we > can include it from irqflags.h and use it in raw_irqs_disabled_flags(). > > As a side-effect, we could now use these flags in .S files. > > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > include/asm-i386/irqflags.h | 3 ++- > include/asm-i386/processor-flags.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/asm-i386/processor.h | 22 +--------------------- > 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
The subject does not reflect the content of the patch :-). And I believe ignore-vgacon-if-hardware-not-present is already in mainline. Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
