Hi Andy, Sorry missed the 'Suggested-by' tag. Can I resend the v6 with this change, so that Wolfram can pick these patches ?
--- ^Divagar >-----Original Message----- >From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andy.shevche...@gmail.com] >Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 9:42 PM >To: Mani, Rajmohan <rajmohan.m...@intel.com> >Cc: Mohandass, Divagar <divagar.mohand...@intel.com>; >robh...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; w...@the-dreams.de; >sakari.ai...@iki.fi; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; tf...@chromium.org >Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] eeprom: at24: add support to fetch eeprom >device property "size" > >On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Mani, Rajmohan ><rajmohan.m...@intel.com> wrote: >> Adding Tomasz... > >Please, don't top post. >Better to resend entire series with all stakeholders included. > >>> Obtain the size of the EEPROM chip from DT if the "size" property is >>> specified for the device. >>> > >I guess it lacks >Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> > >Other than that, looks good to me! > >Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> > > >Wolfram, the binding is ACKed by Rob and this one is in a good shape. >Moreover, it seems like a demand for the property since some IoT stuff >would like to use the driver on ACPI enabled platforms with different sizes. > >Can you go ahead and apply first two patches? It would be really appreciated. > >>> Signed-off-by: Divagar Mohandass <divagar.mohand...@intel.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 4 ++++ >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c >>> index >>> 764ff5df..2199c42 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c >>> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c >>> @@ -570,6 +570,10 @@ static void at24_get_pdata(struct device *dev, >>> struct at24_platform_data *chip) >>> if (device_property_present(dev, "read-only")) >>> chip->flags |= AT24_FLAG_READONLY; >>> >>> + err = device_property_read_u32(dev, "size", &val); >>> + if (!err) >>> + chip->byte_len = val; >>> + >>> err = device_property_read_u32(dev, "pagesize", &val); >>> if (!err) { >>> chip->page_size = val; >>> -- >>> 1.9.1 >> > > > >-- >With Best Regards, >Andy Shevchenko
