On 2017-09-06 02:58, kehuanlin wrote:
Since the command type of UTRD in UFS 2.1 specification is the same
with
UFS 2.0. And it assumes the future UFS specification will follow the
same
definition.
Signed-off-by: kehuanlin <kehuan...@pinecone.net>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 5bc9dc1..c33a2f8 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -2195,10 +2195,11 @@ static int ufshcd_comp_devman_upiu(struct
ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
u32 upiu_flags;
int ret = 0;
- if (hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_20)
- lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE;
- else
+ if ((hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_10) ||
+ (hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_11))
lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_DEV_MANAGE;
+ else
+ lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE;
ufshcd_prepare_req_desc_hdr(lrbp, &upiu_flags, DMA_NONE);
if (hba->dev_cmd.type == DEV_CMD_TYPE_QUERY)
@@ -2222,10 +2223,11 @@ static int ufshcd_comp_scsi_upiu(struct
ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
u32 upiu_flags;
int ret = 0;
- if (hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_20)
- lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE;
- else
+ if ((hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_10) ||
+ (hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_11))
lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_SCSI;
+ else
+ lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE;
if (likely(lrbp->cmd)) {
ufshcd_prepare_req_desc_hdr(lrbp, &upiu_flags,
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subha...@codeaurora.org>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
