Tyler, Stephen

On 2017/9/27 3:23, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdong...@huawei.com>
> Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbai...@codeaurora.org>
> 
> Tested this functionality using SEA support.
> 
> ++Stephen,
> 
> Something to be aware of, this patch will conflict with 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/14/663
> It may make sense to just remove the conditions for the NMI configs as part 
> of this patch or in a series with this patch to avoid merge conflicts.

In your patch, you only remove ACPI_APEI_SEA for the 
ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG, do you need to remove it for the HAVE_NMI?


diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 3dcd7ec..8055997 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ config ARM64
        select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
        select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX
        select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
+       select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG if ACPI_APEI_SEA
        select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF
        select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW
        select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING
@@ -92,6 +93,7 @@ config ARM64
        select HAVE_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
        select HAVE_MEMBLOCK
        select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP if NUMA
+       select HAVE_NMI if ACPI_APEI_SEA
        select HAVE_PATA_PLATFORM
        select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
        select HAVE_PERF_REGS

> 
> Thanks,
> Tyler
>> --- 

Reply via email to