On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 05:42 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> >>> Or something cleaner to avoid copy/paste and focus on proper >>> skb->data[0] access and meaning. > By the way I'm wondering if this is the only place where skb->data is > being accessed. > Isn't eth_type_trans() under IFF_TAP also touching it? Then we need to > check the size earlier.
It is already checked.
