On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 09:08:57AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:55:42 +0200 > Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 11:06:45AM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > > > Add the kptr_restrict setting of 3 which results in both > > > %p and %pK values being replaced by zeros. > > > > > > Add an additional %pP value inspired by the Grsecurity > > > option which explicitly whitelists pointers for output. > > > > > > Amend scripts/checkpatch.pl to handle %pP. > > > > > > This patch is based on work by William Roberts > > > <william.c.robe...@intel.com> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <m...@tobin.cc> > > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> > > Greg, > > I'm curious to why you are adding a "Signed-off-by"? That usually means > that you either help author it, or it is going through your tree. I've > never seen a "Signed-off-by" in passing. That's usually a "Acked-by" or > "Reviewed-by".
I did help author it :) Hope that helps, greg k-h
