3.2.94-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Helge Deller <del...@gmx.de> commit 37511fb5c91db93d8bd6e3f52f86e5a7ff7cfcdf upstream. Jörn Engel noticed that the expand_upwards() function might not return -ENOMEM in case the requested address is (unsigned long)-PAGE_SIZE and if the architecture didn't defined TASK_SIZE as multiple of PAGE_SIZE. Affected architectures are arm, frv, m68k, blackfin, h8300 and xtensa which all define TASK_SIZE as 0xffffffff, but since none of those have an upwards-growing stack we currently have no actual issue. Nevertheless let's fix this just in case any of the architectures with an upward-growing stack (currently parisc, metag and partly ia64) define TASK_SIZE similar. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170702192452.ga11...@p100.box Fixes: bd726c90b6b8 ("Allow stack to grow up to address space limit") Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <del...@gmx.de> Reported-by: Jörn Engel <jo...@purestorage.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hu...@google.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> --- mm/mmap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/mm/mmap.c +++ b/mm/mmap.c @@ -1717,7 +1717,7 @@ int expand_upwards(struct vm_area_struct /* Guard against exceeding limits of the address space. */ address &= PAGE_MASK; - if (address >= TASK_SIZE) + if (address >= (TASK_SIZE & PAGE_MASK)) return -ENOMEM; address += PAGE_SIZE;
