On Tue, 01 May 2007 09:11:18 +0100 Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> >  add-pfn_valid_within-helper-for-sub-max_order-hole-detection.patch
> >  anti-fragmentation-switch-over-to-pfn_valid_within.patch
> >  lumpy-move-to-using-pfn_valid_within.patch
> > 
> > More Mel things, and linkage between Mel-things and lumpy reclaim.  It's 
> > here
> > where the patch ordering gets into a mess and things won't improve if
> > moveable-zones and lumpy-reclaim get deferred.  Such a deferral would limit 
> > my
> > ability to queue more MM changes for 2.6.23.
> 
> The first of these is really a cleanup and should slide into the stack
> before Mobility and Lumpy.  The other two should then join their
> respective stacks anti-fragmentation-... to Mobility and lumpy-... to
> Lumpy.  I would not expect them to increase linkage that way.
> 

yup, that improved things a bit, thanks.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to