On 2017-10-10 16:02:18 [-0300], Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Right, and so far there were no strong objection for this one to be > merged on the -rt tree, Sebastian, can you do it please? Adding Dennis' > reviewed-by, one of maintainers for this driver, ok?
I am still curious about the performance improvement that is with this preempt disable section compared to without it compared to !PREEMPT kernel.. If that is important then migrate_disable() would do that on RT. I guess that there were no splat with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT ? If that is all okay, please resend the patch with the explanation why this preempt_disable() does not matter and I pick it up. > > tree? Anyway, for this patch: > > > > Reviewed-by: Dennis Dalessandro <[email protected]> Sebastian
