Hi, Felipe Balbi <felipe.ba...@linux.intel.com> writes: >>>> I thought that patches 1 and 2, as they are "driver" patches, had to be >>>> applied on USB tree (so Felipe's one), and the others (3 to 7) had to be >>>> applied on STM32-DT tree (Alex's one). Did I miss something? >>> >>> patch 1 is documentation, right? Without the documentation patch, >>> checkpatch will cringe :-) So either way works. >>> >>> If you insist, I can take 1-2 through my tree. No worries. >> >> I don't want to insist :) but for me it is better (and more safe) if you >> take patch 1&2 in your tree, and will take others in mine. > > Okay, I'll apply 1&2
they are now in my testing/next and next branches. -- balbi
