Hi > Thank you for your explanation. > My 1st patch focused to "transfer completed" count (= TCRB) for all case. > In any case, "completed" information should be used. > But in MEM_TO_DEV case, I thought if is OK if data was read from MEM > (= the data will be send to DEV automatically, I didn't care about > interruption) > But yes, your opinion is correct I think. > > I think MEM_TO_MEM should use TCRB. > I think logic is same as your MEM_TO_DEV explanation ? > > Anyway, in all case I can use TCRB in v3 patch, > and it needs abouve explanation.
If so, I think v1 is enough... ? "transfer completed count is important for all case" is no doubt... ? Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
