On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, October 17, 2017 2:19:48 AM CEST Kees Cook wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 10/17/2017 1:20 AM, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> >> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer >> >> to >> >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and >> >> from_timer() >> >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. Removes test of .data field, since >> >> that will be going away. >> >> >> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> >> >> Cc: Pavel Machek <[email protected]> >> >> Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]> >> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> >> >> Cc: [email protected] >> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> >> > >> > >> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> >> >> Do you want this to be carried in the timers tree, or can you pick it up? > > I can pick it up, but only for 4.15.
Yup, this is based on -next. Thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
