On Tue, 1 May 2007 17:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >
> > Do you know whether the current version of GCC generates poor code for
> > pointer
> > subtraction?
>
> You _cannot_ generate good code.
>
> When you subtract two pointers, the C definition means that you first
> subtract the values (cheap), and then you *divide* the result by the size
> of the object the pointer points to (expensive!).
Good compilers even in the 1990's would defer the divide and try and
propogate it out as a multiply the other side for constants, and they'll
also use shifts when possible.
Thus they'll turn
(ptr.element - base.element) < NELEM
into
(ptr.char - base.char) < (constant) [NELEM *sizeof(element) ]
at least for constant operations. Dunno if gcc is that clever
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
