Chris Wright wrote: > * Greg KH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> And is this really a problem? The whole goal of the -stable tree was to >> accomidate the users who relied on kernel.org kernels, and wanted >> bugfixes and security updates. It was not for new features or new >> hardware support. >> >> If people feel we should revisit this goal, then that's fine, and I have >> no objection to that. But until then, I think the rules that we have >> had in place for over the past 2 years should still remain in affect. > > I have to agree. I went back through my mbox and found vanishingly few > pci_id update patches. So it's not clear there's even a big issue. >
Of course you didn't find many -- most people know that's not part of the -stable charter. If you asked for them you'd get them... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
