Hi Bjorn, On 10/17/2017 12:28 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Mon 16 Oct 06:19 PDT 2017, Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani) wrote: >> On 10/12/2017 11:50 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > [..] >>> Please fix this and add my Acked-by >> Sure will do, just want to ask, when i am sending updated patches, should i >> sent all the 4 patches in series or should skip those which are acked by >> you. > > Please include all the patches in each submission (unless the maintainer > tells you that he/she applied some of them already). > > Make sure to add any "Acked-by", "Reviewed-by" and "Tested-by" on your > patches, so that people know that they are already reviewed/tested. > > > And finally, when resending patches, add a section between "---" and the > diff-stat describing changes since the last version - that makes it > easier to see what changed since last time and will help the reviewer > look at the "new" things.
So i was having the ipq8074 q6 remoteproc support based on this series last time. With the msm8996 now getting cleared, i will rebase my patches and repost. Otherwise, just hope that you were ok with the approach [1]. [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1481961.html Regards, Sricharan -- "QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
