i_dir_seq is an opencoded seqcounter. Based on the code it looks like we
could have two writers in parallel despite the fact that the d_lock is
held. The problem is that during the write process on RT the preemption
is still enabled and if this process is interrupted by a reader with RT
priority then we lock up.
To avoid that lock up I am disabling the preemption during the update.
The rename of i_dir_seq is here to ensure to catch new write sides in
future.

Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
---
 fs/dcache.c        |   12 +++++++-----
 fs/inode.c         |    2 +-
 fs/libfs.c         |    6 ++++--
 include/linux/fs.h |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -2405,9 +2405,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_rehash);
 static inline unsigned start_dir_add(struct inode *dir)
 {
 
+       preempt_disable_rt();
        for (;;) {
-               unsigned n = dir->i_dir_seq;
-               if (!(n & 1) && cmpxchg(&dir->i_dir_seq, n, n + 1) == n)
+               unsigned n = dir->__i_dir_seq;
+               if (!(n & 1) && cmpxchg(&dir->__i_dir_seq, n, n + 1) == n)
                        return n;
                cpu_relax();
        }
@@ -2415,7 +2416,8 @@ static inline unsigned start_dir_add(str
 
 static inline void end_dir_add(struct inode *dir, unsigned n)
 {
-       smp_store_release(&dir->i_dir_seq, n + 2);
+       smp_store_release(&dir->__i_dir_seq, n + 2);
+       preempt_enable_rt();
 }
 
 static void d_wait_lookup(struct dentry *dentry)
@@ -2448,7 +2450,7 @@ struct dentry *d_alloc_parallel(struct d
 
 retry:
        rcu_read_lock();
-       seq = smp_load_acquire(&parent->d_inode->i_dir_seq) & ~1;
+       seq = smp_load_acquire(&parent->d_inode->__i_dir_seq) & ~1;
        r_seq = read_seqbegin(&rename_lock);
        dentry = __d_lookup_rcu(parent, name, &d_seq);
        if (unlikely(dentry)) {
@@ -2470,7 +2472,7 @@ struct dentry *d_alloc_parallel(struct d
                goto retry;
        }
        hlist_bl_lock(b);
-       if (unlikely(parent->d_inode->i_dir_seq != seq)) {
+       if (unlikely(parent->d_inode->__i_dir_seq != seq)) {
                hlist_bl_unlock(b);
                rcu_read_unlock();
                goto retry;
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ int inode_init_always(struct super_block
        inode->i_bdev = NULL;
        inode->i_cdev = NULL;
        inode->i_link = NULL;
-       inode->i_dir_seq = 0;
+       inode->__i_dir_seq = 0;
        inode->i_rdev = 0;
        inode->dirtied_when = 0;
 
--- a/fs/libfs.c
+++ b/fs/libfs.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static struct dentry *next_positive(stru
                                    struct list_head *from,
                                    int count)
 {
-       unsigned *seq = &parent->d_inode->i_dir_seq, n;
+       unsigned *seq = &parent->d_inode->__i_dir_seq, n;
        struct dentry *res;
        struct list_head *p;
        bool skipped;
@@ -123,8 +123,9 @@ static struct dentry *next_positive(stru
 static void move_cursor(struct dentry *cursor, struct list_head *after)
 {
        struct dentry *parent = cursor->d_parent;
-       unsigned n, *seq = &parent->d_inode->i_dir_seq;
+       unsigned n, *seq = &parent->d_inode->__i_dir_seq;
        spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
+       preempt_disable_rt();
        for (;;) {
                n = *seq;
                if (!(n & 1) && cmpxchg(seq, n, n + 1) == n)
@@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ static void move_cursor(struct dentry *c
        else
                list_add_tail(&cursor->d_child, &parent->d_subdirs);
        smp_store_release(seq, n + 2);
+       preempt_enable_rt();
        spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
 }
 
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ struct inode {
                struct block_device     *i_bdev;
                struct cdev             *i_cdev;
                char                    *i_link;
-               unsigned                i_dir_seq;
+               unsigned                __i_dir_seq;
        };
 
        __u32                   i_generation;

Reply via email to