From: Feras Daoud <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 27d41d29c7f093f6f77843624fbb080c1b4a8b9c ]

Since ipoib_cm_tx_start function and ipoib_cm_tx_reap function
belong to different work queues, they can run in parallel.
In this case if ipoib_cm_tx_reap calls list_del and release the
lock, ipoib_cm_tx_start may acquire it and call list_del_init
on the already deleted object.
Changing list_del to list_del_init in ipoib_cm_tx_reap fixes the problem.

Fixes: 839fcaba355a ("IPoIB: Connected mode experimental support")
Signed-off-by: Feras Daoud <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Erez Shitrit <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alex Vesker <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c 
b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c
index 0616a65f0d78..75761667be59 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c
@@ -1392,7 +1392,7 @@ static void ipoib_cm_tx_reap(struct work_struct *work)
 
        while (!list_empty(&priv->cm.reap_list)) {
                p = list_entry(priv->cm.reap_list.next, typeof(*p), list);
-               list_del(&p->list);
+               list_del_init(&p->list);
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
                netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev);
                ipoib_cm_tx_destroy(p);
-- 
2.11.0

Reply via email to