On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> wrote: > All of the code paths that ended up doing IRET to usermode did > SWAPGS immediately beforehand. Move the SWAPGS into the common > code. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
> +GLOBAL(swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode) Is adding swapgs to the label really necessary? It's redundant with the usermode part. I'm noticing a trend towards absurdly verbose labels lately. -- Brian Gerst
