Mimi Zohar <[email protected]> wrote: > The patch title and description needs to be updated to refer to > lockdown, not securelevel.
Fixed, thanks. > An additional patch could force these rules to be added to the custom > policy, if lockdown is enabled. I'll have a look at your patch, though at this point I'm leaning towards passing the current series to James for security/next and then passing your patch along afterwards, if that's okay with you. It should still get in the next merge window if that's the case. David
