> Again, a general kernel development rule is to float only one > patch of a given type until you have had feedback on it.
Some update suggestions according also to this general source code transformation pattern were already integrated in other software areas. > These backwards goto cases are sufficiently different from your earlier > patch that got reviews that, They are required if you would ever like to support software refactorings in directions which I propose occasionally. > at most, you should have sent one to the list and then given time > for it to be properly reviewed (up to a week on IIO list typically). Did I present my ideas a bit too quick in this case? Regards, Markus
