On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > Now, the only branch I could actually technically apply this patch to > > would be for-next, but that'd be useless, as that is only an > > integration/testing branch, that doesn't get merged anywhere else than > > linux-next. > > Makes sense, I didn't know the rebase policy for that branch.
for-next is the only branch which I ocasionaly rebase; the most prominent example is due to dropping a particular topic branch. The topic branches themselves, I never actually rebase, as they are usually used as basis for actual development, while for-next really should not; that's just an integration branch. > > Would you be okay with me just redoing the merge into for-next with this > > fixup attributed to you in the merge message (and my git-rerere picking it > > up for upstream)? > > Sure, no problem. Thanks a lot again; I've just pushed out a fixed merge. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
