Hi Wim,
Quoting Wim Van Sebroeck <w...@iguana.be>:
Hi Gustavo,
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
"fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c b/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c
index c0d07ee..c882252 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static long pcipcwd_ioctl(struct file *file,
unsigned int cmd,
return -EINVAL;
pcipcwd_keepalive();
- /* Fall */
+ /* fall through */
}
case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
--
2.7.4
Shouldn't the /* fall through */ come after the } ?
Yep, you are right.
I'll fix that.
Thank you!
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva
Kind regards,
Wim.
