3.16.50-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>

commit d4fec855905fa8bd5fb1c59f73ad2d74a944876a upstream.

There are 3 spots where we call dev_kfree_skb() but we are actually
just doing a normal SKB consumption: __bcmgenet_tx_reclaim() for normal
TX reclamation, bcmgenet_alloc_rx_buffers() during the initial RX ring
setup and bcmgenet_free_rx_buffers() during RX ring cleanup.

Fixes: d6707bec5986 ("net: bcmgenet: rewrite bcmgenet_rx_refill()")
Fixes: f48bed16a756 ("net: bcmgenet: Free skb after last Tx frag")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
@@ -1037,7 +1037,7 @@ static void __bcmgenet_tx_reclaim(struct
                if (skb) {
                        pkts_compl++;
                        bytes_compl += GENET_CB(skb)->bytes_sent;
-                       dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+                       dev_consume_skb_any(skb);
                }
 
                txbds_processed++;
@@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ static int bcmgenet_alloc_rx_buffers(str
                cb = &priv->rx_cbs[priv->rx_bd_assign_index];
                skb = bcmgenet_rx_refill(priv, cb);
                if (skb)
-                       dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+                       dev_consume_skb_any(skb);
                if (!cb->skb)
                        return -ENOMEM;
        }
@@ -1505,7 +1505,7 @@ static void bcmgenet_free_rx_buffers(str
 
                skb = bcmgenet_free_rx_cb(&priv->pdev->dev, cb);
                if (skb)
-                       dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+                       dev_consume_skb_any(skb);
        }
 }
 

Reply via email to