2017-10-30 12:52 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>: > > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >> Hi Julia, >> >> >> 2017-10-29 8:43 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>: >> > /// is to describe the semantic patch, while //# indicates reasons >> > for false positives. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr> >> > >> > --- >> > scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci | 6 +++--- >> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci >> > b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci >> > index d0d00ef..30b248b 100644 >> > --- a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci >> > +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/ifcol.cocci >> > @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ >> > /// Sometimes, code after an if that is indented is actually intended to >> > be >> > /// part of the if branch. >> > /// >> > -/// This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column >> > -/// calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code that >> > -/// is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column. >> > +//# This has a high rate of false positives, because Coccinelle's column >> > +//# calculation does not distinguish between spaces and tabs, so code that >> > +//# is not visually aligned may be considered to be in the same column. >> > /// >> >> Just a nit. >> >> The last /// should be turned into // >> if you want to avoid two blank lines in a series >> after the semantic patch information. >> >> (I can fix it locally if you agree with it and I am supposed to pick up >> this.) > > Thanks for detecting the problem. It would be great if you could pick it > up, since I haven't heard confirmation from Michal that he will start this > again. The change seems fine. Thanks for your help. > > julia > >>
Fix up the second /// and applied to linux-kbuild/misc. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
