Hi Jassi, On 04/11/17 11:51, Jassi Brar wrote: > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Sudeep Holla <[email protected]> wrote: > > ..... > >> +int scmi_do_xfer(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + int timeout; >> + struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle); >> + struct device *dev = info->dev; >> + >> + ret = mbox_send_message(info->tx_chan, xfer); >> >> ^^^^^^^^ > The call still remains unchanged and broken. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/24/502 >
Yes, since you are in favor of abstraction on top of mailbox while Arnd, Bjorn, and me prefer to deal with that in mailbox framework itself, I thought I will keep that discussion separate and get the remaining parts of SCMI reviewed. I have not forgotten about it, just trying to keep it separate. Sorry, I could have been more specific. -- Regards, Sudeep
