On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:46:54AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> > > This is largely code from Andy Lutomirski. I fixed a few bugs > in it, and added a few SWITCH_TO_* spots.
... > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> > Cc: Moritz Lipp <[email protected]> > Cc: Daniel Gruss <[email protected]> > Cc: Michael Schwarz <[email protected]> > Cc: Richard Fellner <[email protected]> > Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> > Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> > Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> > Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > --- > > b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h | 65 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 30 ++++++++++++++--- > b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S | 8 ++++ > 3 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) What branch is that one against? It doesn't apply cleanly against tip:x86/asm from today: patching file arch/x86/entry/calling.h Hunk #1 succeeded at 2 with fuzz 1 (offset 1 line). Hunk #2 succeeded at 188 (offset 1 line). patching file arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S Hunk #1 succeeded at 92 (offset 1 line). Hunk #2 succeeded at 218 (offset 1 line). Hunk #3 succeeded at 246 (offset 1 line). Hunk #4 FAILED at 330. 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S.rej patching file arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S Hunk #1 succeeded at 148 (offset 1 line). Hunk #2 succeeded at 168 (offset 1 line). Hunk #3 succeeded at 508 with fuzz 2 (offset 163 lines). Hunk #4 FAILED at 685. Hunk #5 succeeded at 1119 (offset -54 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 1145 (offset -54 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 1174 (offset -54 lines). Hunk #8 succeeded at 1223 (offset -54 lines). Hunk #9 succeeded at 1350 (offset -54 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 1575 (offset -54 lines). 1 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S.rej -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
