>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jiri Olsa [mailto:jo...@redhat.com]
>Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 6:26 AM
>To: Megha Dey <megha....@linux.intel.com>
>Cc: x...@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>d...@vger.kernel.org; t...@linutronix.de; mi...@redhat.com;
>h...@zytor.com; andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com;
>kstew...@linuxfoundation.org; Yu, Yu-cheng <yu-cheng...@intel.com>;
>Brown, Len <len.br...@intel.com>; gre...@linuxfoundation.org;
>pet...@infradead.org; a...@kernel.org;
>alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com; namhy...@kernel.org;
>vikas.shiva...@linux.intel.com; pombreda...@nexb.com;
>m...@kylehuey.com; b...@suse.de; Andrejczuk, Grzegorz
><grzegorz.andrejc...@intel.com>; Luck, Tony <tony.l...@intel.com>;
>cor...@lwn.net; Shankar, Ravi V <ravi.v.shan...@intel.com>; Dey, Megha
><megha....@intel.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH V0 2/3] perf/x86/intel/bm.c: Add Intel Branch
>Monitoring support
>
>On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:00:05AM -0700, Megha Dey wrote:
>
>SNIP
>
>> +
>> +static void intel_bm_event_update(struct perf_event *event) {
>> +    union bm_detect_status cur_stat;
>> +
>> +    rdmsrl(BR_DETECT_STATUS_MSR, cur_stat.raw);
>> +    local64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, (uint64_t)cur_stat.raw); }
>> +
>> +static void intel_bm_event_stop(struct perf_event *event, int mode) {
>> +    wrmsrl(BR_DETECT_COUNTER_CONFIG_BASE + event->id,
>> +           (event->hw.bm_counter_conf & ~1));
>> +
>> +    intel_bm_event_update(event);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void intel_bm_event_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags) {
>> +    intel_bm_event_stop(event, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void intel_bm_event_read(struct perf_event *event) { }
>
>should you call intel_bm_event_update in here? so the read syscall gets
>updated data in case the case the event is active

We do not update the event->count in the intel_bm_event_update function. We are 
basically saving the status register contents when a task is being scheduled 
out. So it has nothing to do with the read syscall. Having said that, I will 
probably put what stop() does in del() and get rid of the stop() function.
>
>jirka

Reply via email to