Currently, during __bitmap_weight() calculation hweight_long() is used.
Inside a hweight_long() a check has been made to figure out whether a
hweight32() or hweight64() version to use.

However, it's unnecessary to do it in case of __bitmap_weight() calculation
inside the loop. We can detect whether to use hweight32() or hweight64()
upfront and call respective function directly. It also reduces the
vmlinux size.

    Before the patch:
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
12901332        7798930 14541816        35242078        219c05e vmlinux

    After the patch:
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
12901331        7798930 14541816        35242077        219c05d vmlinux

Signed-off-by: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mull...@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawil...@microsoft.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yno...@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@kernel.org>
 
---
Patch was created against torvald's tree (commit 43ff2f4db9d0f764).

 lib/bitmap.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/bitmap.c b/lib/bitmap.c
index d8f0c09..552096f 100644
--- a/lib/bitmap.c
+++ b/lib/bitmap.c
@@ -241,10 +241,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bitmap_subset);
 int __bitmap_weight(const unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned int bits)
 {
        unsigned int k, lim = bits/BITS_PER_LONG;
-       int w = 0;
-
-       for (k = 0; k < lim; k++)
-               w += hweight_long(bitmap[k]);
+       int w = 0, is32 = sizeof(bitmap[0]) ? 1 : 0;
+
+       if (is32) {
+               for (k = 0; k < lim; k++)
+                       w += hweight32(bitmap[k]);
+       } else {
+               for (k = 0; k < lim; k++)
+                       w += hweight64(bitmap[k]);
+       }
 
        if (bits % BITS_PER_LONG)
                w += hweight_long(bitmap[k] & BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(bits));
-- 
2.9.3

Reply via email to