On 11/15/17 at 02:13P, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> 
> After commit 890da9cf0983 (Revert "x86: do not use cpufreq_quick_get()
> for /proc/cpuinfo "cpu MHz"") the "cpu MHz" number in /proc/cpuinfo
> on x86 can be either the nominal CPU frequency (which is constant)
> or the frequency most recently requested by a scaling governor in
> cpufreq, depending on the cpufreq configuration.  That is somewhat
> inconsistent and is different from what it was before 4.13, so in
> order to restore the previous behavior, make it report the current
> CPU frequency like the scaling_cur_freq sysfs file in cpufreq.
> 
> To that end, modify the /proc/cpuinfo implementation on x86 to use
> aperfmperf_snapshot_khz() to snapshot the APERF and MPERF feedback
> registers, if available, and use their values to compute the CPU
> frequency to be reported as "cpu MHz".
> 
> However, do that carefully enough to avoid accumulating delays that
> lead to unacceptable access times for /proc/cpuinfo on systems with
> many CPUs.  Run aperfmperf_snapshot_khz() once on all CPUs
> asynchronously at the /proc/cpuinfo open time, add a single delay
> upfront (if necessary) at that point and simply compute the current
> frequency while running show_cpuinfo() for each individual CPU.

Hi, Rafael

I tested your patch. It's much faster.

But from what I got, calling aperfmperf_snapshot_khz() asynchronously
with 10ms sleep takes much longer than calling aperfmperf_snapshot_khz()
synchronously.

Here's my result on 64 CPUs:

 - async aperfmperf_snapshot_khz() w/ 10ms sleep:

# time cat /proc/cpuinfo > /dev/null
real    0m0.014s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.002s

 - sync aperfmperf_snapshot_khz() w/o any sleep:

# time cat /proc/cpuinfo > /dev/null
real    0m0.002s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.002s

Thanks,
WANG Chao

> 
> Also, to avoid slowing down /proc/cpuinfo accesses too much, reduce
> the default delay between consecutive APERF and MPERF reads to 10 ms,
> which should be sufficient to get large enough numbers for the
> frequency computation in all cases.
> 
> Fixes: 890da9cf0983 (Revert "x86: do not use cpufreq_quick_get() for 
> /proc/cpuinfo "cpu MHz"")
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> Resent with a changelog & tags.
> 
> I'm going to route it via the linux-pm tree.
> 
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c |   74 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h        |    3 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c       |    6 ++-
>  fs/proc/cpuinfo.c                |    6 +++
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h          |    1 
>  5 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> +++ linux-pm/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
>  #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
>  
> +#include "cpu.h"
> +
>  /*
>   *   Get CPU information for use by the procfs.
>   */
> @@ -78,9 +80,11 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file
>               seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: 0x%x\n", c->microcode);
>  
>       if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
> -             unsigned int freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
> +             unsigned int freq = aperfmperf_get_khz(cpu);
>  
>               if (!freq)
> +                     freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
> +             if (!freq)
>                       freq = cpu_khz;
>               seq_printf(m, "cpu MHz\t\t: %u.%03u\n",
>                          freq / 1000, (freq % 1000));
> Index: linux-pm/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
> +++ linux-pm/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
>  #include <linux/percpu.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
>  
> +#include "cpu.h"
> +
>  struct aperfmperf_sample {
>       unsigned int    khz;
>       ktime_t time;
> @@ -24,7 +26,7 @@ struct aperfmperf_sample {
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct aperfmperf_sample, samples);
>  
>  #define APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS        10
> -#define APERFMPERF_REFRESH_DELAY_MS  20
> +#define APERFMPERF_REFRESH_DELAY_MS  10
>  #define APERFMPERF_STALE_THRESHOLD_MS        1000
>  
>  /*
> @@ -38,8 +40,6 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void
>       u64 aperf, aperf_delta;
>       u64 mperf, mperf_delta;
>       struct aperfmperf_sample *s = this_cpu_ptr(&samples);
> -     ktime_t now = ktime_get();
> -     s64 time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(now, s->time);
>       unsigned long flags;
>  
>       local_irq_save(flags);
> @@ -57,38 +57,68 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void
>       if (mperf_delta == 0)
>               return;
>  
> -     s->time = now;
> +     s->time = ktime_get();
>       s->aperf = aperf;
>       s->mperf = mperf;
> -
> -     /* If the previous iteration was too long ago, discard it. */
> -     if (time_delta > APERFMPERF_STALE_THRESHOLD_MS)
> -             s->khz = 0;
> -     else
> -             s->khz = div64_u64((cpu_khz * aperf_delta), mperf_delta);
> +     s->khz = div64_u64((cpu_khz * aperf_delta), mperf_delta);
>  }
>  
> -unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
> +static bool aperfmperf_snapshot_cpu(int cpu, ktime_t now, bool wait)
>  {
> -     s64 time_delta;
> -     unsigned int khz;
> +     s64 time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(now, per_cpu(samples.time, cpu));
> +
> +     /* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */
> +     if (time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS)
> +             return true;
> +
> +     smp_call_function_single(cpu, aperfmperf_snapshot_khz, NULL, wait);
> +
> +     /* Return false if the previous iteration was too long ago. */
> +     return time_delta <= APERFMPERF_STALE_THRESHOLD_MS;
> +}
>  
> +unsigned int aperfmperf_get_khz(int cpu)
> +{
>       if (!cpu_khz)
>               return 0;
>  
>       if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF))
>               return 0;
>  
> -     /* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */
> -     time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), per_cpu(samples.time, cpu));
> -     khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu);
> -     if (khz && time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS)
> -             return khz;
> +     aperfmperf_snapshot_cpu(cpu, ktime_get(), true);
> +     return per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu);
> +}
>  
> -     smp_call_function_single(cpu, aperfmperf_snapshot_khz, NULL, 1);
> -     khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu);
> -     if (khz)
> -             return khz;
> +void arch_freq_prepare_all(void)
> +{
> +     ktime_t now = ktime_get();
> +     bool wait = false;
> +     int cpu;
> +
> +     if (!cpu_khz)
> +             return;
> +
> +     if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF))
> +             return;
> +
> +     for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> +             if (!aperfmperf_snapshot_cpu(cpu, now, false))
> +                     wait = true;
> +
> +     if (wait)
> +             msleep(APERFMPERF_REFRESH_DELAY_MS);
> +}
> +
> +unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
> +{
> +     if (!cpu_khz)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF))
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     if (aperfmperf_snapshot_cpu(cpu, ktime_get(), true))
> +             return per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu);
>  
>       msleep(APERFMPERF_REFRESH_DELAY_MS);
>       smp_call_function_single(cpu, aperfmperf_snapshot_khz, NULL, 1);
> Index: linux-pm/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
> +++ linux-pm/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
> @@ -47,4 +47,7 @@ extern const struct cpu_dev *const __x86
>  
>  extern void get_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
>  extern void cpu_detect_cache_sizes(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
> +
> +unsigned int aperfmperf_get_khz(int cpu);
> +
>  #endif /* ARCH_X86_CPU_H */
> Index: linux-pm/fs/proc/cpuinfo.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/fs/proc/cpuinfo.c
> +++ linux-pm/fs/proc/cpuinfo.c
> @@ -1,12 +1,18 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
>  #include <linux/fs.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
>  
> +__weak void arch_freq_prepare_all(void)
> +{
> +}
> +
>  extern const struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op;
>  static int cpuinfo_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  {
> +     arch_freq_prepare_all();
>       return seq_open(file, &cpuinfo_op);
>  }
>  
> Index: linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -917,6 +917,7 @@ static inline bool policy_has_boost_freq
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +extern void arch_freq_prepare_all(void);
>  extern unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu);
>  
>  extern void arch_set_freq_scale(struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long cur_freq,
> 

Reply via email to