On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Sajjan, Vikas C
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rafael J. 
> Wysocki
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 10:51 PM
> To: Sajjan, Vikas C <[email protected]>
> Cc: Linux PM <[email protected]>; ACPI Devel Maling List 
> <[email protected]>; Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>; Linux 
> Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]>; Seunghun Han 
> <[email protected]>; Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>; Ingo Molnar 
> <[email protected]>; Lakshminarasimha, Sunil Vishwanathpur <[email protected]>; 
> Attar, Abdul Lateef <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/acpi: Fix improper handling of SCI INT for platforms 
> supporting only IOAPIC mode
>
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Vikas C Sajjan <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> The platforms which support only IOAPIC mode and whose SCI INT is
>> greater than 16, passes SCI INT via FADT and not via MADT int src
>> override structure. In such cases current logic fails to handle it and
>> throws error "Invalid bus_irq %u for legacy override". This patch
>> handles the above  mentioned case. While at it, also modify function
>> mp_override_legacy_irq() to use the newly introduced function 
>> mp_register_ioapic_irq().
>
> Actually, is it necessary to make this extra change here?
>
> How complicated would it be to separate it out?
>
> I can move these extra changes into a separate patch and keep only the fix in 
> this patch.

That would be useful I think in case someone wants to backport your
fix, for example.

Thanks,
Rafael

Reply via email to