On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> I see my problem now, my randconfig test series has a patch I never sent >> out, see https://pastebin.com/ZJDHP7g4 ;-) > > I was already wondering why I suddenly started seeing many non-false > positives reaching Linus' tree ;-) > Lately you've been catching all of them in -next, before they had a chance > to appear in upstream.
The patch is only for older compilers that I don't regularly test with, it should not have made a big difference here. I was going to submit the patch but took a look at some of the remaining warnings and came across the bug leading to https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/15/384, so I ended up not sending it, but still had it in my queue. Not sure what happened to that patch though, I think it was in linux-next at some point (which means I dropped it during rebasing), but it's not there now. Arnd
