Hi Neil

see my comments in line

On 11/17/17 21:05, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Hi Yixun, Jian,
> 
> On 17/11/2017 09:02, Yixun Lan wrote:
>> From: Jian Hu <jian...@amlogic.com>
>>
>> There are four I2C masters in EE domain, and one I2C Master in
>> AO domain, the DT info here should describe them all.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jian Hu <jian...@amlogic.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yixun Lan <yixun....@amlogic.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi | 59 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi 
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi
>> index 57faaa9d8013..99e967aff439 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi
>> @@ -129,6 +129,54 @@
>>                              #reset-cells = <1>;
>>                      };
>>  
>> +                    i2c_m0: i2c@1f000 {
> 
> Can you use a more simple "i2c0" phandle naming instead ? or get back to the 
> "i2c_A/B/C/D" naming like in meson_gx to keep consistency ?
> 
Ok, I would prefer to use 'i2c0' then

we had a internal discussion about the inconsistent naming of the I2C
controller, and reach a consensus to name them as:
 the EE domain: ee_i2c_m0, ee_i2c_m1 ..
 the AO domain: ao_i2c_m0, ao_i2c_s0
in the future datasheet.

note: 'ee' means the EE domain, m0 mean the master 0, s0 mean the I2C
slave 0


> [...]
> 
>> +                    };
>> +
>> +                    i2c_m1: i2c@1e000 {
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +                    };
>> +
>> +                    i2c_m2: i2c@1d000 {
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +                    };
>> +
>> +                    i2c_m3: i2c@1c000 {
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +                    };
>> +
>>                      uart_A: serial@24000 {
>>                              compatible = "amlogic,meson-gx-uart", 
>> "amlogic,meson-uart";
>>                              reg = <0x0 0x24000 0x0 0x14>;
>> @@ -312,6 +360,17 @@
>>                              };
>>                      };
>>  
>> +                    i2c_ao: i2c@5000 {
> 
> Can you keep the same "i2c_AO" as in meson-gx ?
> 
> 
sure, can do

> [...]
> 
>> +                    };
>> +
>>                      uart_AO: serial@3000 {
>>                              compatible = "amlogic,meson-gx-uart", 
>> "amlogic,meson-ao-uart";
>>                              reg = <0x0 0x3000 0x0 0x18>;
>>
> 
> Neil
> 
> .
> 

Reply via email to