On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:09:33 -0800 "Raj, Ashok" <ashok....@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Alex > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 02:32:44PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 15:54:56 -0800 > > Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Alex and all, > > > > > > Just wondering if you could merge Robin's patch for the next rc. From > > > all our testing, this seems to be a solid fix and should be included in > > > the stable releases as well. > > > > Hi Jacob, > > > > Sorry, this wasn't on my radar, I only scanned for patches back through > > about when Joerg refreshed his next branch (others on the list speak up > > if I didn't pickup your patches for the v4.15 merge window). > > > > This patch makes sense to me and I'm glad you were able to work through > > the anomaly Harsh saw in testing as an unrelated issue, but... > > > > > > What do we do about this? I certainly can't rip out large page support > > and put a stable tag on the patch. I'm not really spotting what's > > wrong with large page support here, other than the comment about it > > being a mess. Suggestions? Thanks, > > > > Largepage seems to work and i don't think we need to rip it out. When > Harsh tested it at one point we thought disabling super-page seemed to make > the problem go away. Jacob tested and we still saw the need for Robin's patch. > > Yes, the function looks humongous but i don't think we should wait for that > before this merge. Ok. Who wants to toss in review and testing sign-offs? Clearly there's been a lot more eyes and effort on this patch than reflected in the original posting. I'll add a stable cc. Thanks, Alex
