Jan Rekorajski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |> Why is RLIMIT_NPROC apllied to root(uid 0) processes? It's not kernel job to |> prevent admin from shooting him/her self in the foot. |> |> root should be able to do fork() regardless of any limits, |> and IMHO the following patch is the right thing. AFAICS, _all_ resource limits are equally applied to root processes. Why should NPROC be different? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab "And now for something SuSE Labs completely different." [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, please Jan Rekorajski
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, please Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, plea... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, plea... Jan Rekorajski
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, ... Pavel Machek
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for ro... Jan Rekorajski
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for ro... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, please Andreas Dilger
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, please Andreas Schwab
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, plea... Jan Rekorajski
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, ... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for ro... Frank v Waveren
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC f... Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, please Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] no RLIMIT_NPROC for root, plea... Jan Rekorajski