On 11/21/2017 11:17 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:43:38PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:

SNIP

+static void init_saved_rblist(struct rblist *rblist)
+{
+       rblist__init(rblist);
+       rblist->node_cmp = saved_value_cmp;
+       rblist->node_new = saved_value_new;
+       rblist->node_delete = saved_value_delete;
+}
+
+static void free_saved_rblist(struct rblist *rblist)
+{
+       rblist__reset(rblist);
+}
+
+void perf_stat__init_runtime_stat(struct runtime_stat *stat)
+{
+       memset(stat, 0, sizeof(struct runtime_stat));
+       init_saved_rblist(&stat->value_list);
+}
+
+void perf_stat__free_runtime_stat(struct runtime_stat *stat)
+{
+       free_saved_rblist(&stat->value_list);
+}
+
  void perf_stat__init_shadow_stats(void)
  {
        have_frontend_stalled = pmu_have_event("cpu", 
"stalled-cycles-frontend");
-       rblist__init(&runtime_saved_values);
-       runtime_saved_values.node_cmp = saved_value_cmp;
-       runtime_saved_values.node_new = saved_value_new;
-       /* No delete for now */
+       memset(&walltime_nsecs_stats, 0, sizeof(walltime_nsecs_stats));

why do you zero walltime_nsecs_stats in here?

jirka


walltime_nsecs_stats is initialized in process_interval().

init_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats);

Yes, the zero of walltime_nsecs_stats in perf_stat__init_shadow_stats looks a bit redundant. I will remove it.

Thanks
Jin Yao

Reply via email to