On 11/21/2017 11:17 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:43:38PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
SNIP
+static void init_saved_rblist(struct rblist *rblist)
+{
+ rblist__init(rblist);
+ rblist->node_cmp = saved_value_cmp;
+ rblist->node_new = saved_value_new;
+ rblist->node_delete = saved_value_delete;
+}
+
+static void free_saved_rblist(struct rblist *rblist)
+{
+ rblist__reset(rblist);
+}
+
+void perf_stat__init_runtime_stat(struct runtime_stat *stat)
+{
+ memset(stat, 0, sizeof(struct runtime_stat));
+ init_saved_rblist(&stat->value_list);
+}
+
+void perf_stat__free_runtime_stat(struct runtime_stat *stat)
+{
+ free_saved_rblist(&stat->value_list);
+}
+
void perf_stat__init_shadow_stats(void)
{
have_frontend_stalled = pmu_have_event("cpu",
"stalled-cycles-frontend");
- rblist__init(&runtime_saved_values);
- runtime_saved_values.node_cmp = saved_value_cmp;
- runtime_saved_values.node_new = saved_value_new;
- /* No delete for now */
+ memset(&walltime_nsecs_stats, 0, sizeof(walltime_nsecs_stats));
why do you zero walltime_nsecs_stats in here?
jirka
walltime_nsecs_stats is initialized in process_interval().
init_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats);
Yes, the zero of walltime_nsecs_stats in perf_stat__init_shadow_stats
looks a bit redundant. I will remove it.
Thanks
Jin Yao