On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > Thanks to some nice people in #NVIDIA I found what seems to be a > > solution; compile with processor type as "K6". No segfaults, lost > > terminfo or disabled consoles. > > So are there issues with the K7 processor code? Bleh, never mind, I have > > no idea what I am talking about. > The K7 optimisations are not used for I/O space accessess. Or shouldnt be, > but the nvidia code is unreadable so they may have done so Dont forget the nvidia driver is completely SMP broken. As in, trash your filesystems broken. -Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 woes [sol... Petter Sundlöf
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 woes... Alan Cox
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 ... Petter Sundlöf
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 ... Dan Hollis
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX... J . A . Magallon
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-t... Dan Hollis
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.... J . A . Magallon
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX... Kiril Vidimce
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-t... Alan Cox
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.... Kiril Vidimce
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-... Alan Cox
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA ... Kiril Vidimce
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA ... Yoann Vandoorselaere
- Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA ... Kiril Vidimce