On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 01:04:16AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 03:36:15PM -0800, John Kennedy wrote:
> > No, it is all ext3fs stuff that is touching the same areas your
>
> Ok this now makes sense. I ported VM-global-7 on top of ext3 right now
> but it's untested:
Not for long. (:
>
>ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.2/2.2.18pre18/VM-global-2.2.18pre18-7-against-ext3-0.0.3b-1.bz2
Is ext3-0.0.3b the most current/stable? On the FTP site (well,
ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs at least) it looks like
ext3-0.0.2f is current (which is what I've been using), but under the
test directory I see ext3-0.0.3b as well as ext3-0.0.5b. I haven't
heard anything new about ext3fs in a long, long time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
