4.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Changwei Ge <ge.chang...@h3c.com>
commit 1c01967116a678fed8e2c68a6ab82abc8effeddc upstream.
When a node dies, other live nodes have to choose a new master for an
existed lock resource mastered by the dead node.
As for ocfs2/dlm implementation, this is done by function -
dlm_move_lockres_to_recovery_list which marks those lock rsources as
DLM_LOCK_RES_RECOVERING and manages them via a list from which DLM
changes lock resource's master later.
So without invoking dlm_move_lockres_to_recovery_list, no master will be
choosed after dlm recovery accomplishment since no lock resource can be
found through ::resource list.
What's worse is that if DLM_LOCK_RES_RECOVERING is not marked for lock
resources mastered a dead node, it will break up synchronization among
nodes.
So invoke dlm_move_lockres_to_recovery_list again.
Fixs: 'commit ee8f7fcbe638 ("ocfs2/dlm: continue to purge recovery lockres when
recovery master goes down")'
Link:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/63adc13fd55d6546b7dece290d39e373ced6e...@h3cmlb14-ex.srv.huawei-3com.com
Signed-off-by: Changwei Ge <ge.chang...@h3c.com>
Reported-by: Vitaly Mayatskih <v.mayats...@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayats...@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfas...@versity.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jl...@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao...@oracle.com>
Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
@@ -2419,6 +2419,7 @@ static void dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanu
dlm_lockres_put(res);
continue;
}
+ dlm_move_lockres_to_recovery_list(dlm, res);
} else if (res->owner == dlm->node_num) {
dlm_free_dead_locks(dlm, res, dead_node);
__dlm_lockres_calc_usage(dlm, res);
