On 2017년 11월 23일 11:18, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:12 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 2017년 11월 23일 11:07, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 10:45 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>>> On 2017년 11월 23일 10:21, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 14:13 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2017년 11월 17일 00:27, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>>>>>> Line continuations with excess spacing causes unexpected output.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>  drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c 
>>>>>>>> b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
>>>>>>>> index 5dfbfa3cc878..0938c97d46f0 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -146,8 +146,8 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_target(struct device 
>>>>>>>> *dev, unsigned long *freq,
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>        /* If get the incorrect rate, set voltage to old value. */
>>>>>>>>        if (dmcfreq->rate != target_rate) {
>>>>>>>> -              dev_err(dev, "Get wrong ddr frequency, Request 
>>>>>>>> frequency %lu,\
>>>>>>>> -                      Current frequency %lu\n", target_rate, 
>>>>>>>> dmcfreq->rate);
>>>>>>>> +              dev_err(dev, "Get wrong ddr frequency, Request 
>>>>>>>> frequency %lu, Current frequency %lu\n",
>>>>>>>> +                      target_rate, dmcfreq->rate);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IMO, I don't like over 80 char in the one line.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fix it as you chose, but the code I proposed
>>>>>> is what is preferred by CodingStyle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The current code is unintentional.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Right now there are 3 tabs between "Request frequency"
>>>>>> and "Current frequency" in the output.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chanwoo, this is not a simple coding style issue.
>>>>> I'm seeing these unintentional tabs as well.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want to keep it 80 cols with strings (which is r mandatory for 
>>>>> strings in double quotes),
>>>>> We'd better do:
>>>>>
>>>>> -         dev_err(dev, "Get wrong ddr frequency, Request frequency %lu,\
>>>>> -                 Current frequency %lu\n", target_rate, dmcfreq->rate);
>>>>> +         dev_err(dev, "Get wrong ddr frequency, Request frequency %lu,"
>>>>> +                 " Current frequency %lu\n", target_rate, dmcfreq->rate);
>>>>
>>>> I agree with Myungjoo's opinion.
>>>> I think the readability is important. So, I prefer to keep one line within 
>>>> 80 char.
>>>
>>> Read Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
>>>
>>> What I proposed is by far the common style.
>>> I think you should get used to it.
>>
>> Read line.81 in the Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
>> - "2) Breaking long lines and strings"
>>
>> Or, we better to modify the error message within 80 char.
> 
> Exactly!
> 
> line 94:
> 
> never break user-visible strings such as
> printk messages, because that breaks the ability to grep for them

So, I suggested "Or, we better to modify the error message within 80 char.".

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

Reply via email to