On 11/28/2017 7:12 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:07:24PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
In current stat-shadow.c, the rbtree deleting is ignored.

The patch reconstructs the code of rblist init/free, and adds
the implementation to node_delete method of rblist.

Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <[email protected]>
---
  tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
  tools/perf/util/stat.h        |  3 +++
  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c b/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c
index c53b80d..0fdd2aa 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static struct stats runtime_aperf_stats[NUM_CTX][MAX_NR_CPUS];
  static struct rblist runtime_saved_values;
  static bool have_frontend_stalled;
+struct runtime_stat rt_stat;
  struct stats walltime_nsecs_stats;
struct saved_value {
@@ -103,6 +104,18 @@ static struct rb_node *saved_value_new(struct rblist 
*rblist __maybe_unused,
        return &nd->rb_node;
  }
+static void saved_value_delete(struct rblist *rblist __maybe_unused,
+                              struct rb_node *rb_node)
+{
+       struct saved_value *v;
+
+       BUG_ON(!rb_node);
+       v = container_of(rb_node,
+                        struct saved_value,
+                        rb_node);

any reason for this to be cut on 3 lines? single line wouldn't cross 80 chars 
length..

jirka


Oh, yes, one line is enough. I will fix that.

Thanks
Jin Yao

Reply via email to