Quoting Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>:
So I have to ask WHY this information was not in the changelog of the patch
in question:
1) How it works
2) Why comments have been chosen over macros
I will add this info and send the patch again.
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
It's not a reviewers job to chase that information down.
While I can understand that the comments are intentional due to existing
tools, I still prefer the macro/annotation. But I'm not religious about it
when there is common consensus. :)
Awesome
Thanks, Thomas.
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva
