Hi Pierre,
On 30/11/17 12:34, Pierre Morel wrote:
> When userland VFIO defines a new IOMMU for a guest it may
> want to specify to the guest the physical limits of
> the underlying host IOMMU to avoid access to forbidden
> memory ranges.
> 
> Currently, the vfio_iommu_type1 driver does not report this
> information to userland.
> 
> Let's extend the vfio_iommu_type1_info structure reported
> by the ioctl VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO command to report the
> IOMMU limits as new uint64_t entries aperture_start and
> aperture_end.
> 
> Let's also extend the flags bit map to add a flag specifying
> if this extension of the info structure is reported or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 42 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h       |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 8549cb1..7da5fe0 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -1526,6 +1526,40 @@ static int vfio_domains_have_iommu_cache(struct 
> vfio_iommu *iommu)
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * vfio_get_aperture - report minimal aperture of a vfio_iommu
> + * @iommu: the current vfio_iommu
> + * @start: a pointer to the aperture start
> + * @end  : a pointer to the aperture end
> + *
> + * This function iterate on the domains using the given vfio_iommu
> + * and restrict the aperture to the minimal aperture common
> + * to all domains sharing this vfio_iommu.
> + */
> +static void vfio_get_aperture(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, uint64_t *start,
> +                             uint64_t *end)
> +{
> +     struct iommu_domain_geometry geometry;
> +     struct vfio_domain *domain;
> +
> +     *start = 0;
> +     *end = U64_MAX;
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> +     /* loop on all domains using this vfio_iommu */
> +     list_for_each_entry(domain, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
> +             iommu_domain_get_attr(domain->domain, DOMAIN_ATTR_GEOMETRY,
> +                                     &geometry);
> +             if (geometry.force_aperture) {
> +                     if (geometry.aperture_start > *start)
> +                             *start = geometry.aperture_start;
> +                     if (geometry.aperture_end < *end)
> +                             *end = geometry.aperture_end;
> +             }
> +     }
> +     mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> +}
> +
>  static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>                                  unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  {
> @@ -1560,6 +1594,14 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>  
>               info.iova_pgsizes = vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu);
>  
> +             minsz = min_t(size_t, info.argsz, sizeof(info));
> +             if (minsz >= offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_info,
> +                                      aperture_end)) {
> +                     info.flags |= VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_APERTURE;
> +                     vfio_get_aperture(iommu, &info.aperture_start,
> +                                       &info.aperture_end);
> +             }
> +
>               return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &info, minsz) ?
>                       -EFAULT : 0;
>  
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index 0fb25fb..780d909 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -519,6 +519,9 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_info {
>       __u32   flags;
>  #define VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_PGSIZES (1 << 0)     /* supported page sizes info */
>       __u64   iova_pgsizes;           /* Bitmap of supported page sizes */
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_APERTURE (1 << 1)    /* supported aperture info */
> +     __u64   aperture_start;         /* start of DMA aperture */
> +     __u64   aperture_end;           /* end of DMA aperture */
>  };
>  
>  #define VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 12)
> 

In the past I was told by Alex that using the capability chain
extensions to add some new capabilities was a better approach:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/6/751

I did that kind of exercise in
[PATCH v9 7/7] vfio/type1: return MSI geometry through
VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO capability chains

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2016-May/016892.html

The patch was not used eventually but maybe that can help.

Thanks

Eric

Reply via email to