On 30/11/17 16:02, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > On 30-Nov 14:41, Juri Lelli wrote:
[...] > > If the DL changes (which I shall post again as soon as tip/sched/core is > > bumped up to 4.15-rc1) get in first, this is going to be useless (as the > > DL kthread gets ignored by the scheduling class itself). But, this looks > > good to me "in the meantime". > > Just to better understand, you mean that the DL kthread does not send > out schedutil updates? It doesn't have a "proper" bandwidth (utilization) :/. So it gets "unnoticed" and schedutil updates are not triggered. > > If that's the case I agree we can discard this patch... that's also > one of the reasons why I move it at the end of this series. Not sure about this though, not my call :). I guess this still helps until we get the DL changes in. Best, Juri