On Mon, 7 May 2007 08:29:28 -0700
Kristen Carlson Accardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 04 May 2007 15:30:48 -0500
> James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 11:17 -0700, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> > > Give anyone who has access to scsi_device access to the genhd struct as
> > > well.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Index: 2.6-git/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- 2.6-git.orig/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> > > +++ 2.6-git/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> > > @@ -1711,6 +1711,7 @@ static int sd_probe(struct device *dev)
> > >
> > > dev_set_drvdata(dev, sdkp);
> > > add_disk(gd);
> > > + sdp->disk = gd;
> > >
> > > sdev_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdp, "Attached scsi %sdisk %s\n",
> > > sdp->removable ? "removable " : "", gd->disk_name);
> > > Index: 2.6-git/drivers/scsi/sr.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- 2.6-git.orig/drivers/scsi/sr.c
> > > +++ 2.6-git/drivers/scsi/sr.c
> > > @@ -604,6 +604,7 @@ static int sr_probe(struct device *dev)
> > > if (sdev->media_change_notify)
> > > disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_MEDIA_CHANGE_NOTIFY;
> > > add_disk(disk);
> > > + sdev->disk = disk;
> > >
> > > sdev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, sdev,
> > > "Attached scsi CD-ROM %s\n", cd->cdi.name);
> > > Index: 2.6-git/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- 2.6-git.orig/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
> > > +++ 2.6-git/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
> > > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ struct scsi_device {
> > >
> > > struct device sdev_gendev;
> > > struct class_device sdev_classdev;
> > > -
> > > + struct gendisk *disk;
> > > struct execute_work ew; /* used to get process context on put */
> > >
> > > enum scsi_device_state sdev_state;
> >
> > If you're going to do this, you need to take on board removing the
> > struct gendisk from all the ULD structures (since it's now become
> > generic).
> >
> > James
> >
>
> Ok - I can send that as a separate patch series, or I can include it
> in this one. Which is preferred?
>
I interpret the lack of response to this question to mean that I can just
decide for myself - in which case I prefer to send this as a separate
patchset after this one is integrated.
Thanks!
Kristen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
