On 05/12/2017 03:00, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:32:20AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 02:57:52PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:13:44AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>>> At this moment, we have both the interrupt setup and the polling enabled. >>>> The >>>> interrupt does nothing more than forcing an update while the temperature is >>>> polled every second. >>>> >>>> We can do much better than that, threshold is set to 65C in the DT and the >>>> passive cooling device enters in the dance when 75C is reached. We need to >>>> sample the temperature at 65C in order to let the IPA gather enough values >>>> for >>>> the PID computation. If the SoC is running at a temperature below 65C, we >>>> will >>>> be constantly polling for nothing. >>>> >>>> This patch disables the sensor when the temperature is below 65C and >>>> enables it >>>> when passing the threshold. It results the thermal sensor driver will have >>>> no >>>> activity most of the time. >>>> >>>> Cc: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com> >>>> Cc: Leo Yang <leo....@linaro.org> >>> >>> s/Yang/Yan :) Have tested this patch on Hikey at my side: >> >> Oops sorry :) >> >>> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo....@linaro.org> >>> Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo....@linaro.org> >> > > Is this still needed after the latest rework done?
No longer needed. -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
