It was <2017-12-05 wto 14:54>, when Stephan Mueller wrote: > Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017, 13:35:57 CET schrieb Łukasz Stelmach: > > Hi Łukasz, > >> Use memcpy_fromio() instead of custom exynos_rng_copy_random() function >> to retrieve generated numbers from the registers of PRNG. >> >> Remove unnecessary invocation of cpu_relax(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelm...@samsung.com> >> --- >> drivers/crypto/exynos-rng.c | 36 +++++------------------------------- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/exynos-rng.c b/drivers/crypto/exynos-rng.c >> index 894ef93ef5ec..002e9d2a83cc 100644 >> --- a/drivers/crypto/exynos-rng.c >> +++ b/drivers/crypto/exynos-rng.c
[...]
>> @@ -171,6 +143,8 @@ static int exynos_rng_get_random(struct exynos_rng_dev
>> *rng, {
>> int retry = EXYNOS_RNG_WAIT_RETRIES;
>>
>> + *read = min_t(size_t, dlen, EXYNOS_RNG_SEED_SIZE);
>> +
>> if (rng->type == EXYNOS_PRNG_TYPE4) {
>> exynos_rng_writel(rng, EXYNOS_RNG_CONTROL_START,
>> EXYNOS_RNG_CONTROL);
>> @@ -180,8 +154,8 @@ static int exynos_rng_get_random(struct exynos_rng_dev
>> *rng, }
>>
>> while (!(exynos_rng_readl(rng,
>> - EXYNOS_RNG_STATUS) & EXYNOS_RNG_STATUS_RNG_DONE) &&
>> --retry)
>> - cpu_relax();
>> + EXYNOS_RNG_STATUS) & EXYNOS_RNG_STATUS_RNG_DONE) &&
>> + --retry);
SM>
SM> Is this related to the patch?
KK> It looks like unrelated change so split it into separate commit with
KK> explanation why you are changing the common busy-loop pattern.
KK> exynos_rng_readl() uses relaxed versions of readl() so I would expect
KK> here cpu_relax().
Yes. As far as I can tell this gives the major part of the performance
improvement brought by this patch.
The busy loop is not very busy. Every time I checked the loop (w/o
cpu_relax()) was executed twice (retry was 98) and the operation was
reliable. I don't see why do we need a memory barrier here. On the other
hand, I am not sure the whole exynos_rng_get_random() shouldn't be ran
under a mutex or a spinlock (I don't see anything like this in the upper
layers of the crypto framework).
The *_relaxed() I/O operations do not enforce memory
Thank you for asking the questions. I will put the above explanations in
the commit message.
>>
>> if (!retry)
>> return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> @@ -189,7 +163,7 @@ static int exynos_rng_get_random(struct exynos_rng_dev
>> *rng, /* Clear status bit */
>> exynos_rng_writel(rng, EXYNOS_RNG_STATUS_RNG_DONE,
>> EXYNOS_RNG_STATUS);
>> - *read = exynos_rng_copy_random(rng, dst, dlen);
>> + memcpy_fromio(dst, rng->mem + EXYNOS_RNG_OUT_BASE, *read);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
Kind regards,
--
Łukasz Stelmach
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
