On Thu, 10 May 2007 22:23:32 +0800 "liang yuanen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Three are many many spin-lock in the kernel code, and in multi-core > conditions, it push down the kernel performance.why are we reduce > spin-lock and replace it with lock-free? If you can find algorithms which are lock free, faster than taking the lock and have bounded resource consumption then you can test them with the kernel and send patches. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
