Kill the old write_trylock_irqsave() implementation, as it is slower -- we can
do better with the new version. Also the older patch is more invasive and
inconsistent in style with the spin_trylock_irqsave() of mainline and -mm.
Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Sripathi Kodi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/spinlock.h | 2 --
include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h | 1 -
include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h | 2 --
kernel/spinlock.c | 14 --------------
4 files changed, 19 deletions(-)
---
diff -ruNp a/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h b/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
--- a/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h 2007-05-10 23:26:09.000000000 +0530
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h 2007-05-10 23:34:25.000000000 +0530
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ unsigned long __lockfunc _write_lock_irq
int __lockfunc _spin_trylock(spinlock_t *lock);
int __lockfunc _read_trylock(rwlock_t *lock);
int __lockfunc _write_trylock(rwlock_t *lock);
-int __lockfunc _write_trylock_irqsave(rwlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags);
int __lockfunc _spin_trylock_bh(spinlock_t *lock);
void __lockfunc _spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lock) __releases(lock);
void __lockfunc _read_unlock(rwlock_t *lock) __releases(lock);
diff -ruNp a/include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h b/include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h
--- a/include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h 2007-05-10 23:26:09.000000000 +0530
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h 2007-05-10 23:34:11.000000000 +0530
@@ -64,8 +64,6 @@
#define _spin_trylock(lock) ({ __LOCK(lock); 1; })
#define _read_trylock(lock) ({ __LOCK(lock); 1; })
#define _write_trylock(lock) ({ __LOCK(lock); 1; })
-#define _write_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
- ({ __LOCK_IRQSAVE(lock, flags); 1; })
#define _spin_trylock_bh(lock) ({ __LOCK_BH(lock); 1; })
#define _spin_unlock(lock) __UNLOCK(lock)
#define _read_unlock(lock) __UNLOCK(lock)
diff -ruNp a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h
--- a/include/linux/spinlock.h 2007-05-10 23:26:09.000000000 +0530
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h 2007-05-10 23:33:41.000000000 +0530
@@ -171,8 +171,6 @@ do {
\
#define spin_trylock(lock) __cond_lock(lock, _spin_trylock(lock))
#define read_trylock(lock) __cond_lock(lock, _read_trylock(lock))
#define write_trylock(lock) __cond_lock(lock, _write_trylock(lock))
-#define write_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
- __cond_lock(lock, _write_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags))
#define spin_lock(lock) _spin_lock(lock)
diff -ruNp a/kernel/spinlock.c b/kernel/spinlock.c
--- a/kernel/spinlock.c 2007-05-10 23:26:09.000000000 +0530
+++ b/kernel/spinlock.c 2007-05-10 23:35:08.000000000 +0530
@@ -60,20 +60,6 @@ int __lockfunc _write_trylock(rwlock_t *
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_write_trylock);
-int __lockfunc _write_trylock_irqsave(rwlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
-{
- int ret;
-
- local_irq_save(flags);
- ret = _write_trylock(lock);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- local_irq_restore(flags);
- return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(_write_trylock_irqsave);
-
/*
* If lockdep is enabled then we use the non-preemption spin-ops
* even on CONFIG_PREEMPT, because lockdep assumes that interrupts are
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
