On 07-Dec 10:45, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 30-11-17, 15:57, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > Yes, that's a pretty trivial update with a confusing changelog. > > > > If we think it's worth to keep (and correct as well) I'll update the > > commit message. > > We also need to update the commit log based on feedback from Vikram on > V2. Which said that the utilization can't change around the lock here > as we are within rq lock section, though max can change (maybe). So > this patch only takes care of locking before reading max.
Ok, right... will do. Thus you are still of the opinion to keep this patch in the series? -- #include <best/regards.h> Patrick Bellasi
