Hello, Jiri. On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:18:07AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > so I can see this to be useful for HW conters only, because > of limited number of regs > > as for the higher level on which this could be implemented I > see some pitfals with event rotations as Peter mentioned and > task/cpu contexts scheduling.. while the hw-level implementation > seems pretty straight forward
Heh, yeah, maybe. > I'll test the code and let's see ;-) Thanks. I'll think more about it and see whether this can be evolved into something useable. Thanks. -- tejun
